- About BVD and the advantages of establishing a BVD-PI Negative herd -
 

.
.
About BVD and Persistently Infected animals...
.
BVD is a common viral disease of cattle that results in significant economic losses estimated to be in excess of two billion dollars annually. Individually, a producer can experience up to a $56 loss per cow in a herd where a persistently infected (PI) animal is present. The seriousness of this disease has grown to the point where the Academy of Veterinary Consultants has adopted a position statement to control and eventually eradicate this disease from North America. 

Eradication of this virus is difficult as PI calves often survive while appearing to be fully healthy. When PI calves enter production channels they shed enormous numbers of virus particles - up to 10 million particles daily - infecting otherwise healthy cattle. PI cattle are the main source for transmission and spread of BVD.

The managers of the Montana BVD-PI Herd Screening Project believe there may be added incentive beyond better herd health for ranchers who identify “PI negative” calves. They simply may be worth more money come marketing time.

“We think calves screened as PI-negative deserve at least a 4¢ per pound price advantage over unscreened calves,” says Clint Peck, Montana’s director of Beef Quality Assurance. “PI-negative status says the animals are not persistently infected with the BVD virus and greatly reduces the risk of spreading the disease throughout the production chain.”  The main negative health effect of BVD is it can inhibit conception and/or cause abortion in susceptible females. It also suppresses the immune system, making infected animals more susceptible to other diseases.

The costs and impacts of the BVD virus can escalate once calves leave the ranch and end up in a feedlot, says Dr. John Paterson, Extension Beef Specialist at Montana State University. “The BVD-PI calf that exposes its feedlot pen mates to massive amounts of BVD virus on a daily basis creates economic chaos for the feedlot operator,” Paterson says. “Feedyard research in Kansas indicates there's a $47 per head cost for every animal going into the feedyard because of PI exposure.”

.
.

.
.
 
.